|
Post by etymon on Nov 4, 2006 23:48:06 GMT 1
^^^Exactly, I think that's part of it. Listeners can really sympathize with Mary. The pain, intensity and heart in her music is really compelling for some and, if anything, her voice at times serves as a complementing instrument, not the instrument of focus like, say, a Whitney Houston's would be. Mary, to me, is more involving, and so her limited vocal power is of marginal concern. Her own attachment to her material is what's so powerful, to me, not her "belting it out" just for the sake of getting a round of applause.
|
|
|
Post by Moderator on Nov 5, 2006 5:33:35 GMT 1
Thankyou for your agreement with me 'etymon'
|
|
ti8er
New Member
Posts: 36
|
Post by ti8er on Nov 6, 2006 0:40:50 GMT 1
yeah cuz ppl listen to music for the performance not just for the sound ... and the "story" of that person's life works together with the performance, so i guess thats were it all fits together....
but sometimes i think you feel emotion not just by connecting the person's "life story" with the performance but more thru the actual sound...in that case skill would come into play...and if u have more skill then u have a greater avenue to explore different representations of emotions thru sound...and then u wouldnt necessarily resort to telling the public your "life story" becuz in that case the music/sound would speak for itself....
|
|